Translate

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Defense Contractor False Certification Lawyer and Military Contractor False Certification Lawyer: Defense Industry Faces New Scrutiny of Anti-Corruption Practices - Businessweek

Defense Contractor False Certification Lawyer and Military Contractor False Certification Whistleblower Lawyer Handles Defense Contractor False Certification Whistleblower Lawsuits, Military Contractor False Certification Qui Tam Lawsuits, and False Certification of Military Weapons Lawsuits by Defense Contractor False Certification Lawyer and Military Contractor False Certification Whistleblower Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

War profiteering and fraudulent defense contractors have cost the United States Billions of Dollars through corrupt businesses seeking payment from the government for defective products, services that were never provided, and dangerous products.  Relators and Whistleblowers are encouraged to blow the whistle on defense contractors that cheat the government through False Certification of Product Quality, Product Substitution, Cross Charging, False Certification of Services Provided, Charging for Services or Goods not provided, Violations of the Truth-in-Negotiations Act ("TINA"), and Improper Cost Allocation.

If you are aware of a corrupt defense contractor or other large government contractor that is defrauding the United States Government out of millions or billions of dollars and or is selling the United States Defective Goods or Services, please feel free contact International Military Contractor False Certification Whistleblower Lawyer and Defense Contractor False Certification Lawyer Jason S. Coomer, or go to the following web page: Defense Contractor False Certification Lawyer and Military Contractor False Certification Whistleblower Lawyer.


Defense Industry Faces New Scrutiny of Anti-Corruption Practices - Businessweek

"More than 100 defense companies from Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT), the world’s largest arms maker, to Czech military truck manufacturer Tatra AS, face a new test of their anticorruption practices as an independent watchdog puts the industry under examination."

"The U.K. arm of Transparency International will issue its first ranking of about 130 companies worldwide on Oct. 4, grading their corporate guidelines for avoiding corruption. Each company is being assessed against 34 criteria and will receive a grade from A to F, an executive for the not-for-profit organization said in an interview in London."

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.